Pages
- What is a blog and how can I use it most efficiently
- The idea behind this blog
- How can I support this site?
- Poll: Wishes for future articles
- Contact
Categories
- easy stuff for beginners (16)
- guitar in general (27)
- Mark Knopfler gear (38)
- misc (27)
- MK guitar style and licks (29)
- recording (4)
- understanding music (15)
- Vintage guitars (15)
Archives
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Links
Meta
Recent Comments
- Which key is In the Gallery on the first Dire Straits CD? Am or Bbm? (1)
- alun: Much better in the Am key! They probably thought that it dragged a bit. Good job...
- Guitar refinishing – nitro vs poly and how to remove a polyester finish (6)
- Eric: That seems about right. Except the type of finish we are talking about is polyurethane, not...
- Recording distorted guitars – The digital POD vs the analog Tubeman (1)
- Matt: The Tubeman sounds better indeed, especially for the solo. POD is little bit more muted,...
- Romeo and Juliet on National Style-O (10)
- jarda: Hi, very interesting web, i like the stuff here a lot, are you planning to write smth...
- Mark Knopfler’s Music Man HD 130 212 guitar amp (14)
- edubcn: Hi, I´ve always loved the mandela´s guitar sound. Do you think the reverb was the one...
- Mark Knopfler licks using the Memphis scale (6)
- Miles Crane: Thanks for putting this out. I have been following Mark’s playing since the...
Which key is In the Gallery on the first Dire Straits CD? Am or Bbm?
Posted in: MK guitar style and licks, misc by Ingo on June 30, 2009
The song In the Gallery of Dire Straits’ first album seems to be in a strange key. The official songbooks transcribe it in the key of Bbm. On all live versions Dire Straits played it in Am. So, why is this?
If you listen carefully to the CD version and and try to play along with your guitar, you will notice that Bbm seems to work better than Am, but still is not perfectly in tune with the recording. The reason is that apparently In the Gallery was played and recorded in Am, but then it was for some reason decided to speed it up a bit. In other words, the pitch/speed control on the master tape machine must have been turned up a bit, probably because the recorded version was regarded as too slow. (The theoretical second explanation that they simply tuned all guitars a bit higher does not really make sense to me.)
For this reason it is also higher than standard tuning, about 3 – 4 % (Bbm is a semi-tone higher and would equal about 5 -6 % speed increase). Today there are computer algorithms (called time shifting) which allow to change the speed of a recording without altering pitch, but nothing like this was availaible in 1978 (and even today these algorithms often create audible artefacts like distortion or a weird sound).
You can easily revert this change and reduce the speed with a computer algorithm so that the song is Am again – the same speed and pitch it was recorded at. I did this for you, so here is In the Gallery as it was really played.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
The difference is subtle of course but still clearly audible. The voice sounds deeper and fuller, also the guitar sound changes a bit and appears darker. It is also a question of taste which one you like better and which one you regard as more original – the one as it was really played, or the one with the intentional artistic change. You can leave a comment (even without registering or leaving an email) to let me/us know what you think about it.
If you like this article or my blog and want to say thank you, you can click here to buy me a beer via Paypal.Related articles
Mark Knopfler’s 1938 Gibson Advanced Jumbo acoustic guitar
Posted in: Mark Knopfler gear, Vintage guitars, guitar in general by Ingo on May 14, 2009
Mark Knopfler owns two beautiful vintage Gibson acoustic guitars which he seems to play a lot on his studio albums these days. One is a 1953 Gibson Southerner Jumbo, the other a 1938 Gibson Advanced Jumbo which I would like to feature in this article.

The 1953 Gibson Southerner Jumbo is the acoustic guitar in the centre, the 1938 Advanced Jumbo is the one on the right side (picture courtesy Guy Fletcher)
Both have a sunburst finish and thus look a bit similar at first glance. Besides the different body shape, the different fingerboard inlays tell you the model when you see Knopfler playing one of these on any pictures or videos. While the 1953 has double parallelogram pearl fingerboard inlays, the 1938 has the so-called diamond and arrowhead inlays.

Left: parallelogram inlays on the 1953 Southerner Jumbo, diamond and arrowhead inlays on the 1938 Advanced (right)
The Advanced Jumbo was only produced this way from 1935 to 1940 (but was reintroduced in 1990) , and only about 300 of these were made. It was the top of Gibson’s acoustic guitar line back then. The neck has a slimmer shape than on some other Gibson models. Maybe for this reason Knopfler prefers it for playing licks and different stuff on it, and possibly rather uses the 1953 for strumming.
The back and sides are of rosewood, while the neck is mahagony. The Advanced Jumbo was only available in sunburst, note that guitars from before 1938 had less yellow than the 1938 on the following pictures (courtesy provide.net/~cfh/).

If you want to learn more about all special features and specs of this guitar, I recommend this great site.
I played a few old Gibsons but not an Advanced Jumbo, but all I played sounded great, sometimes even “too good to be true” (like an 1958 LG-1, which I could not afford at a price of about 1,400 € in the early 90ies, wish I had sold whatever back then and would own the best acoustic I heard now). So I can imagine that Knopfler’s Advanced Jumbo is a great sounding guitar, something way beyond the stuff we normal mortals come along.
You can watch and hear Knopfler playing it on this BBC video:
Or watch this guy on youtube playing another 1938 AJ:
I am still dreaming of buying one of these on the next flea market for a few bucks (dream on, Ingo…)
If you like this article or my blog and want to say thank you, you can click here to buy me a beer via Paypal.Related articles
Musitek guitar amp – predecessor of the Dire Straits Music Man 130HD 212
Posted in: Mark Knopfler gear by Ingo on May 04, 2009
I recently saw this extremely rare amp offered on ebay – a 1974 Musitek combo amp that looks very similar to the “Dire Straits” amp – the Music Man 130 HD 212.

1974 Musitek amp
In fact Musitek was one of the names under which the very first amps were produced before the company was renamed to Music Man (see this article for more info on Music Man amps). As this was the first and only time I have ever seen such an early model, I want to feature it with this article.
The overall control layout was already identical to the later Music Man amp. The only difference I can see is a rotary switch with the positions ‘Off – Low – Normal – High’ at the position where normally the power switch is located. The later switch also allows a low and high power position, but not the third ‘Normal’ mode.

Rotary switch insteasd of the power toggle switch
The rear panel looks very different from the Music Man version – almost like a self-labelled prototype (which possibly is the case here – or there was originally a proper panel which is missing on the pictured amp).
The 12AX7 phase inverter tube and the Accutronics reverb tank seems to be the same as they were later. Note that the Celestion speaker is not original. The other one is a 1974 Alnico speaker by Eminence, however with a smaller magnet than the model used in the Music Man.

rear view (left speaker non original)

The inside looks similar to the Music Man
Related articles
How to apply a waterslide decal to a guitar
Posted in: guitar in general by Ingo on April 30, 2009
I recently put one of these waterslide Fender decals on one of my guitars, which is basically an easy job that does not take very long. However, I remembered that I heard of even a luthier who got big problems with it. The mistake he made was that he left the decal too long in the water. If the decal loosens from the paper and swims around in the water, you are lost. So here is in very short how to do it:
1. Sometimes you must cut out the decal first with a pair of scissors. Normally – like with the “official” stuff from Fender – this is not necessary.
2. Put the decal into water and leave it there just a few seconds. Do not wait until it starts to loosen.
3. Take it out of the water and wait for some time – something like 1 – 4 minutes – until the decal starts to loosen. Try very carefully to move it on the paper to check if it has loosended everywhere.
4. Simply slide it directly from the paper to the position you want it to be on your guitar. The surface must be smooth by the way, which means a clean and dry laquered surface.
5. If there are wrinkles, try carefully to smooth it with a wet finger. Normally it can be moved for some time on the guitar surface.
6. Carefully wipe with a soft cloth over the decal to remove any water. Do this very lightly so that you do not destroy the decal.
7. Wait until it has dried.
8. If there are any small bubbles (which is normall not the case) you can use a needle to open these.

That’s it. Again, the important trick is to take it out of the water and then wait until it starts to loosen, never leave it in the water so long.
If you like this article or my blog and want to say thank you, you can click here to buy me a beer via Paypal.Related articles
Mark Knopfler’s Music Man HD 130 212 guitar amp
Posted in: Mark Knopfler gear by Ingo on March 07, 2009
Mark Knopfler started to play Music Man amps around September 1978. These amps were used for all live gigs from then on until the end of the Making Movies On Location tour in 1981. The Music Man amp was used on some studio recordings from this era, probably also on Making Movies, but it was most likely not used on the first album, and neither on Communiqué (here amps borrowed by Robert Palmer, probably Fenders, were used).

This amp shares many features of a Fender Twin Reverb, e.g. the same control layout, the same effects, a similar size, a similar look. It is surely fair to say that it was Music Man’s version of the Twin Reverb, although the sound is different.
HD stands for heavy Duty, 130 for 130 Watts from four 6CA7 tubes (could be switched to low power), and 212 for two 12”-Speakers.
Some general info on Music Man guitar amps can be found in one of the last articles.
Controls
The HD 130 212 has two independent, non switchable channels, just like the vintage blackface or silverface Twin Reverb. Originally the two-channel design allowed to plug in two guitars so that two players could share one amp on a little stage – something that did not really make much sense and was hardly used, except the band could only afford one amp. Both channels have two input jacks (labelled 1 and 2), with 2 being less sensitive so that high gain instruments (e.g. keyboards) could be plugged in without distorting the first gain stage (which is pre the volume pot so that reducing volume does not help in case of being overdriven with a too loud signal). Next to the input we find a Bright switch that works similar to the one on Fender amps: a small capacitor partially overrides the volume poti with the effect that the more treble is boosted the lower the volume poti is set – at almost 10 the switch has zero effect while at 1 it is strongest. Next is the Volume control, and three tone controls (Treble, Mid, Bass). The whole circuit looks identical to a Twin Reverb, but internally the values of the tone capacitors and resistors are different. The treble end is works at a lower frequency range than on the Twin so the sound is a bit fatter with a peak in the high mids. The midrange poti is also more effective than on Fender amps. All Music Man amps also feature a Deep switch that boosts bass frequencies. As this switch works between the pre and poweramp section, it is affective for both channels (the later models of the RD/RP series also have a bright and deep switch but these work and sound completely different).

Controls on the left channel

Controls on the right channel

The Deep switch works after the pre-amp stage and thus affects both channels
The second channel additionally features a Reverb control and a tremolo with a speed and intensity control. The reverb comes from an Accutronics reverbtank of the same size as in the Twin reverb. Nevertheless the reberb sound is different, less dense and a bit brighter which is intended by the circuit design. The tremolo also sounds different than on a Fender amp. If you set the Intensity control to more than approximately 3, a second harmonic modulation is gradually added.
Sound
As said, the Music Man sounds different than the Fender amps of its time. The sound is a bit more nasal, with more midrange available. As the pre amp is a solid state design, some typical transistor distortion is gradually added when tyou crank up the amp. For this reason they were better suited for clean guitar sounds, and soon became a standard for country players. However, the transistor distortion does not sound that bad and is helpful to add some grit for clean sounds. The tube power amp section adds a typical warmth that solid state amps normally lack off. Listen to any Dire Straits live recordings from this time and you will get the idea.
With 130 watts through two 212 speakers the amp is extremely loud, maybe one of the reasons Knopfler changed from the Twin to the Music Man when the stages became bigger.
Tube driver or solid-state driver?

This 12AX7 tube for the phase inverter was later replaced with a solod state design
The first Music Man amps (up to ca. 1977) had an additional 12AX7 pre amp tube for the phase inverter section. This tube and the corresponding hand-wired board were replaced with a new soild state circuit board that was said to be more reliable (with the old design a total failure plus the destruction of the expensive output transformer was possible in case of a certain malfunction scenario – however nothing you should really worry about if you own an amp from this time). Generally the tube vesrion is said to sound warmer, although I feel both sound nice and and not too different.
It cannot be answered with absolute certainty whether the one that MK used had the 12AX7 tube driver (like all amps before 1977) or not.
Generally in the first series (with the tube) the power switch was at the front panel of the amp and the stand-bye switch at the back. The power switch was labelled with “Hi – Off – Lo” (in the down position it was switched to about only 65 Watts).
The later series had the stand-bye switch at the front, labelled with “Hi – Stand-bye – Lo”. On a few concert pictures you can clearly see that MK’s amp had the “High – Off – Lo” labelling (and thus might be the model with driver tube), however, I meanwhile have seen a few transition amps that still had the “Hi – Off – Lo” labelling but already the solid-state driver stage. What makes it more difficult is the fact that around the time of the introduction of the solid-state driver version, Music Man called back earlier amps from the dealers to change them to solid-state as well. Also, it was offered as a free service to convert amps with the tube driver to solid-state.
There’s one picture available from the Making Movies tour book that shows the back of MK’s amp. It is almost impossible to see any details, but a slight light reflection (of the aluminium tube cover) might be just at the position of the additional tube. All in all, I admit there is not much more than some speculation on this question.
Speakers
This amp can be seen first with Dire Straits on the Chorus TV 1978 video (a concert from October 14, 1987 in Paris). There are a few shots that show the amp from its back side. Unfortunately it is not possible to tell from these pictures which speaker is inside with certainty.

Alnico speakers with huge square magnets

The first amps had Eminence speakers with square alnico magnets, but I have seen models with a different Eminence speaker type that has square magnets of different size and shape (picture below). Then – about 1980 – the amp came with Eminence speakers with round ceramic magnets. Furthermore, the amp was optionally available with Electro Voice EVM 12L speakers – the same speakers that Mark Knopfler prefered in later years, e.g. in his Marshall cabinets. These Electro voice speakers normally had a huge golden magnet, but the OEM version in Music Man amps often had black magnets (picture below).

These speakers were probably only used about 1978 - they have most likely ceramic magnets

Optional Electro Voice 12L speakers
The second HD 130
Starting around the time of the US tour in early 1979 (March/April), MK used two of these amps. From summer 1979 one of them was to be equipped with speakers with aluminium dust caps (instead of the normal black paper caps), something that can easily be spotted through the amp grill on pictures of this time. The most famous speakers with aluminium caps was the JBL D120F that was optionally available in some n Fender amps (including the Twin Reverb). In fact, a Twin Reverb with JBLs has for a long time been something like the industry standard for ultra-clean sounds.
There are chances that Knopfler used JBLs as well, although I meanwhile tend to believe that the dust caps in his amps were a bit smaller than on JBLs. Many other speaker maufacturers had them as well, e.g. on the speakers in the Roland Jazz Chorus, or the Black Widow speakers that were installed in David Knopfler’s Peavey Deuce amp on the same tour.
Speakers with aluminium dust caps have a harsher sound with more treble than a conventional speaker. This can easily be heard on all live recordings from the second half of 1979.

Talking Heads as guests on stage in 1979 - note the aluminium dust caps on the Music Man amp (far right)
The “Clapton mod”
The most prominent endorser for Music Man amps in the 70ies was surely Eric Clapton, who played two HD 130 heads with 4 speaker cabinets (with two 12” JBL speakers in each, probably D120F or K120). Clapton’s amps were modified by the Music Man company. This modification included a different circuit for the bright switch, more gain, and a pre-amp out and power-amp in. Music Man service dealers or distributors were sent an installtion instruction for this mod, so it is theoretically possible that Knopfler had it as well.
It is unclear why Knopfler started to have two of these amps on stage. One possibility was to have a spare amp in case the first one breaks down, or he played both simultaneously to have more power, or – with a total of four speakers – to hear the amps better from different spots on stage. I prefer to think that both were active (e.g. because both seem to be in use on rehearsals like in the BBC Arena documentary from 1980).
However, it seems that none of the input jacks at the front panel of the second amp was connected (an argument for the spare amp version), or this indicates that the amps had those pre-amp outs and power-amp ins to connect them from the back side (like Clapton did), an argument for the Clapton mod on Knopfler’s amps.
While the more-gain option of this mod does not change the clean sound, the bright switch works completely different with the Clapton mod, more like on later Music Man amps. It is much sharper, but less brittle. In addition, it is always effective, no matter of the volume knob position, while the standard bright switch is the more efficient, the lower the volume position is.
The same Music man amps were used on the Making Movies tour in 1981, driving closed Marshall 4 x 12” cabinets. They reappeared on the Nelson Mandela birthday concert, Wembley Stadium, 1988.

Note the solid state circuit board for the pre amp and the point-to-point wired small board for the power amp

Related articles
Older Posts »