Blog Post Categories
- Dire Straits/ Mark Knopfler live pictures and videos (31)
- Guitar in general (91)
- Vintage guitars (46)
- Mark Knopfler gear (144)
- Misc (72)
- MK guitar style and licks (84)
- Recording (16)
- Understanding music (28)
- Contents (List)
- Mark Knopfler Gear Database
- User Pictures Gallery: Build your own MK guitar
- Gear on all songs for all albums – WIKI
Recent Forum Posts
- Forum: Gear
Topic: Stumped identifying speakers in 212HD 130
By: Mike D - 6 months ago
- Forum: Gear
Topic: Music Man HD130 212 maintenance
By: direstrat - 6 months ago
- Forum: Gear
Topic: Schecter one piece birdseye maple neck with serial number
By: hamerfan - 7 months ago
- Forum: Gear
Topic: unknown equipement on the musicman guitar strap
By: J.Francois - 9 months ago
- Forum: Playing style, riffs, licks, soli, chords
Topic: Lights of Taormina SlideTuning?
By: mrandel - 11 months ago
- Tokai Springy Sound - Japanese Vintage Stratocaster Copies that caused lawsuit (5)
- Enjoyed the articles covering Tokai and Squire. Check out my photo book of Tokai... Feb 19, 6:15 PM
- Gear on album Brothers in arms (15)
- Out of phase, middle position roll off one of the tone controls all the... Feb 16, 11:59 AM
- National Style-O 1932 and 1936 - Double Power (4)
- Is this guitar for sale? Feb 14, 12:27 PM
- Sensational: Sultans of Swing guitar track solo - without backing tracks - from Guitar Hero 5 (95)
- Ha Ha Ha – copied and recopied stories stolen from other neighbouring cultures. Not... Feb 12, 6:48 PM
- Tonight, at the Principal Church of the Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter,... Feb 07, 5:58 PM
- 8-7-12Mirela spune: Buna. Ai putea sa imi cauti si mie driverele de sunet si... Feb 07, 5:02 PM
- Johnnie:Allt rÃ¶rande detta Ã¤r givetvis "clearat" med IFK, sÃ¥ du behÃ¶ver inte oroa dig.... Feb 02, 5:01 PM
- Mark Knopfler on facebook and myspace (3)
- The Schecter Story: Schecter Guitar Research - Dream Machines - The Van Nuys Era (24)
- Easy way to cure a scratchy voice coil in a guitar speaker (2)
- Hi. Great, great, great! I had that same problem with my Music Man RD112... Feb 06, 2:31 PM
- The wrong colour of the first Mark Knopfler Signature Strats (40)
- Finally I bought a used one last week. SE00064 dakota red Jan 15, 9:59 PM
- Schecter Dream Machine red 1980 (12)
- Color is Candy Apple Red, but it has a silver undercoat like earlier Fender... Jan 15, 8:55 PM
- Suhr Custom MK-1 and Pensa Custom MK-1 (5)
- I disagree Cathleen Jan 04, 12:58 AM
- Music Man Guitar Amps (39)
- Hi i have had a m/man 210 hd one thirty fo 30 yrs. ,great... Dec 20, 12:12 PM
- Coming new products (16)
- Any news on the availability of the DM Bodies? I would love to build... Dec 19, 2:20 PM
- Guitar refinishing – nitro vs poly and how to remove a polyester finish (54)
- Keys for all Mark Knopfler and Dire Straits songs (5)
- I think Tunnle of Love is in F major. In Live version,they had finished... Dec 09, 7:11 PM
- The Gibson Chet Atkins CEC - Classical Electric Guitar with Nylon Strings (18)
- Hi Thanks for the info. I have one of each at the moment. I... Dec 07, 4:33 PM
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- MK-Guitar on Facebook
- MK-Guitar on Twitter
- My Facebook profile
- My old Dire Straits Guitar Page
- My personal homepage
- My Youtube channel
Latest updates and news
Tweets by @mk_guitar_com
Top Comment Authors
- Ingo (421)
- Jean-François (166)
- Jeff - Anthony (36)
- Erik (33)
- Fletch (29)
- J.Francois (29)
- Dermot O'Reilly (28)
- Arthur Luz (23)
- TheWizzard29 (22)
- zach (22)
- John (20)
- Knopfleberg (20)
- Philipp (19)
- Eduard (18)
- Morten (17)
- danny (14)
- Jim (14)
- thomas (13)
- Alex Mircica (12)
- Lapelcelery (12)
- Chris (11)
- Ryan T. (11)
- David (10)
- liftedcj7on44s (10)
- dave (9)
Posted in: Recording by Ingo on October 14, 2009
I recently recorded an acoustic guitar for a cover version of Brothers in Arms. I used two different microphones – a large diaphragm condensor Audio Technica AT 4050 near the bridge and a small diaphragm condenser Schoeps CM 64 over the neck. I had seen pictures showing Mark using a similar approach from a radio promo recording he did a few years back.
I recorded both mics to separate channels of a stereo track into Cubase. When hearing the result I was pleased with the broad stereo sound and left it as it was. Of course you can mix both sources with different panning and volumes to be much more versatile.
I made a sound file for you for demonstration, you can hear the mix of both microphones but also both individually (in the mix and alone) to judge about their different sound capabilities. The old (1962) Schoeps is a great mic. It has a tube circuit and a nice treble boost for that warm and crisp high end. Of course there are many other great ways to position two microphones, this being just one.
The guitar is a 1976 Gibson MK 81 by the way. It will be featured in a future article."Buy me a beer" - donate for the site via PayPal. Or buy a backing track in my online shop :)
Posted in: Guitar in general,Misc,MK guitar style and licks,Recording,Understanding music by Ingo on February 17, 2009
Today I want to feature a little software that was available as a free dowwnload on the official Mark Knopfler site some years ago. It is a flash mixer with individual tracks of the song Sailing to Philadelphia, in other words, a software mixer that does not only allow to listen to the individual instruments but also to adjust the volume of these. For this reason it was described as “Anatomy of a track”.
You only need to download one file (mixer.exe) and simply start it on your computer (it requires flash), the individual sound files for each track are already included. Unfortunately the sound quality is not very good due to a heavy compression, and it is only the first two minutes of the song. You will see individual mixer channels for drums, lead guitar, vocals (both Mark Knopfler and James Taylor on the same track), acoustic guitar, bass, and another track for both keyboards plus pedal steel guitar.
It is fun to mix the tracks as you want, and it is very interesting to hear the tracks alone. As effects are already included for each track, you can hear details like the reverb or delays on the lead guitar. And of course it is great to figure out what Knopfler actually plays. Unfortunately the tool does not allow fast forward / backward, so you always have to start from the beginning again.
A real gem is the acoustic guitar, a fingerpicking played by Knopfler that was later overdubbed. Note how his unique way of playing adds so much rhythm and groove to the song, something that unfortunately was never recaptured on live performances of this song. I also tried to play a similar picking on the video I made for another article of this blog, so you might want top check out this one again to see the fingering.
The lead guitar was the white ’64 Stratocaster that Knopfler played also on stage during the Sailing to Philadelphia tour. You can clearly hear reverb, compression and delay on this track, also note the deep bass, and the percussice attack."Buy me a beer" - donate for the site via PayPal. Or buy a backing track in my online shop :)
Posted in: Easy stuff for beginners,Guitar in general,Recording by Ingo on December 22, 2008
One of the last articles was about how to record a clean guitar, and the POD and the Tubeman have already been mentioned there. This time it is about what these two devices were mainly built for: a distorted guitar sound. You will hear the same track first recorded with the POD (lead and rhythm guitars), then with the Tubeman, both devices were connected directly to the mixing desk. Here is some background information on both devices.
The POD by Line 6 was one of the first commercial devices to emulate the sound of different tube amps. You can choose between different Fender, VOX, Marshall or boutique amps. In addition it features a variety of built-in digital effects. Like with most digital devices, the number of different sounds and options is astonishing. You can switch between a Fender Bassman and a Marshall JMT in a second, and you can save all sounds as presets. Due to the headphones output it is also very nice for practising.
This is the original Tubeman by Hughes & Kettner. It is all analog and features a 12AX7 tube for distortion. It can be used a a floor effect before any guitar amp, or as a recording solution in the studio. Three tone controls plus a mid boost allow different sounds, while the amount of distortion is adjusted with the gain control and a selector switch to choose one of four different gain patterns (rock, blues, funk, jazz).
There is no headphones out, but outs for the mixer (with speaker simulation) or to the guitar amp (without speaker simulation). As it is anaog, you cannot save sounds as preset of course, and there are no effects available. Although a tube requires high voltage, it is powered with only 9 V which are internally transformed.
To me the winner is the Tubeman, its throaty sound has a certain warmth that I miss with the POD but maybe your taste is different. And of course a lot depends on the setting on both devices. And don’t forget that the POD is an early digital device, later ones might sound better. I might compare more recent devices against a vintage tube amp in a future article.
What are your thoughts? Use the comment function to let us know."Buy me a beer" - donate for the site via PayPal. Or buy a backing track in my online shop :)
Posted in: Easy stuff for beginners,Guitar in general,Recording by Ingo on December 21, 2008
In this article you will find a sound clip to hear the sound of a guitar amp …
(a) mic’ed close to the speaker (Shure SM 57)
(b) mic’ed at a distance of about 2 m (6 ft.) (Audio Technica AT 4050)
(c) with both microphones [of (a) and (b)] blended together.
The close mic’ing results in a dry and precise sound with hardly room. When you move back the microphone, the guitar will become lower in volume. As the sound reflections from the walls always have the same volume, they will seem to be louder now. In other words, the more you go back from the amp, the more room you will hear. Here it depends on the acoustic quality of your room whether this leads to pleasing or unwanted results.
What is often done is blending the signals of two (or more) microphones. This way you have the precise attack of close mic’ing plus some natural sounding room. You can also pan both microphones differently to create a wider stereo sound in your mix. You should definitely record both sources to different tracks of your recording software to keep all options open in the final mix.
Blending two microphones inavoidably leads to phase issues, some frequencies are cancelled, others are boosted. This effect depends on the distance between both microphones and varies actually with each inch. Many engineers move around the second (or both) microphones while listening (e.g. with headphones) to find the ultimate “sweet spot”, the position that has a magic sound. But this will be covered in a future article.
The video is in youtube high quality. If you have problems with bandwidth, you can watch it in normal quality directly at youtube, click here.
By the way, the amp is a clone of an old Fender Tweed Princeton, model 5F2-A. I built it out of scratch many years ago. It has a ceramic (!) Jensen 10″ speaker from the early 60ies and normally sounds great at all volumes. Its 4.5 watts are ideal for recording, you simply set the only volume control to the desired level of distortion and shape the sound with the single “Tone” control. The guitar is a maple neck Telecaster."Buy me a beer" - donate for the site via PayPal. Or buy a backing track in my online shop :)
Posted in: Easy stuff for beginners,Guitar in general,Recording by Ingo on December 20, 2008
There are countless ways to record an electric guitar. While some of these do not really work for distorted guitars, you have even more choices when you want to record a clean guitar: you can plug it directly into the mixing desk, or use a DI-box before. Then there are special recording solutions like digital or analog pre-amps that also emulate the influence of the guitar speaker or even the microphone. And of course there is still the old-fashioned way – using a guitar amplifier and one or more microphones.
All of these possibilities have some advantages so it is impossible to say which one is best in a particular sitaution. The video of this article (below) demonstrates some of these different approaches. This way you can hear yourself what you like and what not. Remember however that there are so many variables even in each single approach, e. g. the pre-amplifier can give you a signal that is much brighter than the guitar amp or much darker – depending on your settings. Nevertheless, the video should reveal some general sound differences, like the very bright direct out of the amp or the rather muddy sound when plugged into the desk with a certain input impedance. You will always hear the same guitar playing the same riff with the same guitar cable (with exception of #3)
Version 1 – Directly into the mixing desk
Here the guitar is plugged into on of the phone-jack inputs of a mixing desk. These are normally designed for line-level instruments like keyboards or pre-amps. The lower volume of the guitar is no problem, but a guitar expects an input impedance (resistance of the input) of a few hundred kOhms. A normal line in has only something like 10 – 100 kOhms however. This circumstance leads to a strong reduction of the guitar pick-up’s resonance peak. This is the frequency at which the pick-up is loudest. It is a result of the pick-ups electrical values like the number of windings and the resistance of the wire of its coil. Typically the frequency is somewhere in the range from 2 – 7 kOhms, and the effect is more pronounced with a single coil pick-up – a reason of the characteristic sharp treble you associate with a Fender guitar. With a too low input impedance these frequencies are dampened and the sound easily becomes a bit muddy.
Version 2 – Using a guitar effect as DI-box
One way to avoid the problem described for version #1 is to use a so-called DI-box (DI for direct injection) – a little device that has a proper input impedance and is plugged between the guitar and the mixing desk. There is another possibility to have the same effect that does not require to buy anything new: use any of your guitar effects as a replacement for the DI-box. A guitar effect has of course a proper input impedance for a guitar, and this is even true if the effect is switched off (with exception of a few effects with a so-called true hardware bypass). You can hear on the video that the sound is much clearer, you have more treble.
Version 3 demonstrates the influence of the guitar cable
This is the same setup as in version #2 with exception of a different cable between the guitar and the effect. Here I used a long guitar cable (9m = 30 ft. ) instead of the 3m (10 ft.) cable used on the other versions. The sound is darker. This effect has nothing to do with the quality of the cable or its internal resistance. Instead it results of the capacity each shielded cable has. It acts like a capacitor which changes the resonance frequency of the pick-up (see version #1). For example, a Fender Stratocaster pick-up has a resonance frequency about 6 kOhms, but if you connect a capacitor to it, this frequency moves down to maybe 4 kHz (with a small capacitor of a few hundred pF) or maybe even to 2 kHz with a slightly bigger capacitor. You can easily measure the capacity of a guitar cable and you will find values up to more than 1nF ( = 1000 pF) . The capacity has to do with the size of the cable: if all other dimensions are the same, a cable with 20 ft. will have a capacity twice as high than a cable with 10 ft. – no matter if both cables are low or high quality.
Version 4 – The POD
The POD by Line 6 was one of the first digital amp emulators. These convert the guitar signal into digital data and use mathematical algorithms to imitate the effect of a vacuum tube, a guitar amp circuit, or even a guitar speaker. Note that the picture was taken later and does not show the setting used on the recording.
Version 5 – A Tubeman tube pre-amp
The Tubeman by Hughes & Kettner is an analog device that uses a real tube. It has gain and volume controls plus different tone controls and allows a great variety from clean to heavily distorted sounds. It has outputs for a mixing desk or a guitar ams (with or without speaker simulation). Note that the picture was taken later and does not show the setting used on the recording.
Version 6 – A guitar amp with a microphone
The heading says it all. In this case a Music Man guitar amp with a Shure SM57 microphone. The SM57 does not cost much and is something like a standard for recording guitars.
Version 7 – The direct out of the amp
Some guitar amps have a direct out. With this jack the signal from the pre-amp stage can be routed into another power amp or into a mixing desk. However, the guitar speaker is important to shape the tone, it actually cuts all frequencies above something like 6 kHz. As the speaker is missing now, you get a very crisp but sometimes rather harsh sound. Especially for distorted guitar sounds, this almost never leads to good results.
Note that the amp setting is the same as in the previous example (!)
What does it sound like in the mix?
The next video sequences demonstrate how some of the previous setups sound in a complete mix. All the raw sounds have been slightly EQ’ed, and some compression, reverb, and delay has been added.
You will hear:
a) Directly into the desk through the effect (see version #2)
b) The POD (see version #4)
c) The Tubeman (see version #5)
d) The mic’ed amp (see version #6)
e) The direct out of the amp (see version #7)
The video is in youtube high quality. If you have problems with bandwidth, you can watch it in normal quality directly at youtube, click here.